Welcome to Observer Media, the official home of the Wareham and Tri-Town Observer newspapers. observermedia

Observer Media -
The Home of the Wareham
and Tri-Town Observer

Welcome Visitor
Fri, Mar 12, 2010
12 people currently online.
Get Your Online
Subscription Today!!
FrontPage News

School Committee should be ashamed

In This Corner - Robert Slager
School Committee should be ashamed

    This was supposed to be one of the most glorious weeks in Wareham High School history. The boys basketball team captured the Eastern Massachusetts Division 3 title on the famed parquet floor at the Garden on Monday, earning a shot at the state championship on Saturday. There was palpable pride in the eyes of every single student at the school. It didn’t matter if the were jocks or geeks or Goths. This week they were all Vikings. They were unified. They were one. All of Wareham was one.
    On Wednesday night, under a shameless swirl of tired partisan politics, members of the School Committee decided to put their egos ahead of everything else. They decided to steal some of the thunder of the young men and women they are supposed to represent. And then they had the temerity to claim it was all for the children.
    The School Committee’s decision to vote no-confidence in the Board of Selectmen on Wednesday night had nothing to do with the students of Wareham High School, or any other student for that matter. It was about pride and power. It was about protecting turf and protecting egos.
    Two weeks ago selectman Brenda Eckstrom made a Power Point presentation about the school budget during her board’s meeting. She was very careful to acknowledge that selectmen have no authority over the School Committee or school budget. As a mother of four, she simply wanted to point out that while school programs and supplies have been cut to the bone, school administrators are being given raises each year. She said her constituants have repeatedly expressed concern to her about cuts at the school. The School Committee had been invited numerous times to attend joint meetings with selectmen to discuss those concerns but have never accepted the invitation. 
    Apparently the School Committee considered Eckstrom’s Power Point presentation to be part of an on-going political “attack” on its members. So, at the end of their meeting on Wednesday, the School Committee decided to vote “no-confidence” in the Board of Selectmen. Eckstrom sat in the audience after the School Committee had invited selectmen to attend. But Eckstrom wasn’t allowed to speak, even when she came under attack by the committee. She was told she should have spoken during “Citizen’s Participation,” which took place before the School Committee launched its attack on selectmen.
    School Committee Chairman Robert Brousseau tried to justify that decision by saying Eckstrom never personally asked to be put on the agenda. After the meeting she personally asked to be placed on the agenda of the upcoming March 24 meeting agenda.
    Brousseau, who is not seeking re-election to the School Committee, told the Standard-Times “I control the agenda. I'm inclined to think that if we have a joint meeting it might be best to wait until after the (April 6) election.”
    Well, there you have it. This isn’t about the children. This is about the election. This is about the School Committee playing shameless partisan politics.
    It started last summer when School Committee member Geoff Swett, who also happened to be a board member of the political group Citizens for a Better Wareham, suddenly brought concerns about the town’s Health Care Trust Fund to the attention of other School Committee members. The School Committee was so concerned that school employees had overpaid their share into the town’s health insurance plan they hired an auditor to look into the situation and asked the town to pay for half of it.
    The problem was the School Committee hired the same auditor the town had used for several years before deciding not to renew his contract. Essentially the School Committee wanted the town to pay a person they had already parted with to review his own previous audits of the Health Care Trust Fund.
    Selectmen and then interim town administrator John Sanguinet wisely refused to be strong-armed into such an illogical plan by the School Committee. So the School Committee decided to pay for the auditor with school funds. Of course the auditor backed up earlier School Committee claims that the town owed its employees $1.9 million because the fund was not administered correctly.
    The School Committee then held a press conference, notifying only the partisan Standard-Times, to announce the “mistake.”
    The selectmen took the prudent course and hired an independent auditor, who discovered that the fund was actually in a surplus, not a deficit. Town employees hadn’t been ripped off. The former town accountant had simply made it look that way by screwing up the accounting of the fund.
    No one from the School Committee ever apologized for pressing the panic button. Not a single member of the committee showed up when the independent auditor made his final report to selectmen last month. The Finance Committee was able to make it. Several of its members had the class to apologize for jumping the gun. But not the School Committee. Apparently that would have been too hard on the old ego.
    During a School Committee meeting in January, when massive cuts to the school budget were announced, School Superintendent Barry Rabinovitch actually suggested to parents that if they don’t like cuts to the budget they should vote the selectmen out of office.
    “Support someone who will put youth first,” Rabinovitch said.
    That quote was not from the Wareham Observer. It was in the Wareham Courier.
    Anyone who knows anything about town government understands that selectmen have nothing to do with the school budget. It is formulated by the School Committee and presented for approval at Town Meeting. Certainly Rabinovitch knows that. If he doesn’t he should be fired immediately.
    It’s obvious he was trying to lay the blame for school cuts on the selectmen, knowing full well they had nothing to do with it. That’s what upset Eckstrom so much. The school superintendent was telling parents to vote selectmen out of office because they don’t care about children, even though it was the School Committee who crafted the school budget. It was a political cheap shot of enormous magnitude.
    In response to that claim, Eckstrom prepared a Power Point presentation to show the raises school administrators have received as school programs were being cut. She also noted that any increase in the school budget means town services will be cut. She’s absolutely correct about that. The town has no spare change. The School Committee is now asking for nearly $1 million more for the school budget than last year. That money has to come from somewhere. Should the library and the Counsel on Aging be closed to accommodate this request? That’s not an exaggeration. That is a very real possibility.
    It appears that members of the School Committee are attempting to pass this political hot potato into the hands of selectmen because they don’t want to be held responsible for failing to keep the school budget under control. They are being held accountable for their actions and they don't like it. So they are playing shameless politics in order to pass the buck to someone else.
    There are other examples of this kind of thing. The VoteApril6 political group has made a concerted effort to gets its material into the schools. Members passed out buttons inside the middle school during a recent Charter Review Committee meeting. Rabinovitch said he has no idea how a box of VoteApril6 buttons found its way to his desk. He said he has no idea who is behind the group.
    VoteApril6, of course, is run by Dick Wheeler, a board member for the Citizens for a Better Wareham, just like School Committee member Geoff Swett. VoteApril6 signs always seem very close to signs for candidates seeking to replace current members of the Board of Selectmen.
    Then there was Bob Brady’s “community” meeting last summer at the middle school, a meeting in which only those opposed to the current Board of Selectmen were allowed to attend. Who approved the use of school property for that politically charged meeting? If you guessed the School Committee, go to the head of the class. Perhaps it was just a coincidence that Bob Brady’s girlfriend works in the school superintendent’s office.
    A few years ago Observer founder Elizabeth Pezzoli witnessed Brousseau extending his right arm in a Nazi salute in the direction of Bruce Sauvageau while standing in the parking lot of Town Hall. The Observer called on him to apologize, noting that such behavior is completely unworthy of member of the School Committee.
    Brousseau never did apologize. Now, just weeks before Sauvageau is up for re-election for a fourth term, Brousseau voted no-confidence in the Board of Selectmen. That, of course, came just weeks before Brousseau will step down from the School Committee.
    One last classless gesture on the way out the door.
    Yes, there is a political game being played right now. It’s being run by the School Committee. And what’s really sad about all this is that this week should have belonged to the young men and women of Wareham High School. This was their week to celebrate. This was their week to be proud. The headlines in the papers should have belonged to them.
    If anyone deserves a vote of no confidence it’s the School Committee.

 
 Read More ...
In This Corner - Robert Slager - 5 opinions posted

STATE OF PURE JOY: Wareham beats Bedford! State championship game awaits on Saturday!

Wareham takes the Garden by storm
STATE OF PURE JOY: Wareham beats Bedford! State championship game awaits on Saturday!

    BOSTON - The Wareham High Vikings dreamed a very big dream at the start of the season, and now that dream is just a single game away.
    The boys varsity basketball team took to the parquet floor of the TD Banknorth Garden Monday afternoon in the Division 3 semifinals and soundly defeated Bedford, 63-49, to earn a shot at the state championship Saturday at the DCU Center in Worcester. Game-time has not yet been announced.
    The Vikings will face New Leadership, a charter school from Spingfield that defeated Whitinsville-Christian on Tuesday. 
    Jordan Rezendes and Jules Tavares put on a show in the biggest game of their lives. Rezendes took over in the fourth quarter, scoring 10 points to ice the victory. Tavares brought the crowd to its feet with an alley-oop dunk that would have impressed Kevin Garnett, who has thrown down a few of his own on the very same floor for the Boston Celtics.
   Perhaps lost in the highlight reel but no less important to Wareham's victory was the monsterous effort of senior center Ryan Pina, who completely disrupted the Bedford offense with his tremendous interior defense while pulling down 22 rebounds in his spare time.
   Wareham, which improved to 24-1 with the victory, struggled at times on offense, especially early on when big-game jitters gripped both teams. But the Vikings slowly took control with their relentless man-to-man pressure, which led to a blizzard of Bedford turnovers that turned into transition baskets on the other end.
    Rezendes, who battled early foul trouble after being whistled for two first-quarter charges, responded as he usually does: With ice-water in his veins when the stakes are at their highest. He finished with a team-high 20 points. Tavares tallied 16 and Pina chipped in with 12.
     Michael Ingram-Rubin paced Bedford with 21 points.
     Wareham got off to a slow start, missing a string of 3-pointers in the early minutes of the first quarter. With Bedford shifting from a 2-2-1 zone to a 1-2-2 zone, the Vikings had trouble getting their motion offense in high gear. Razendes took care of that after taking a smooth pass from Tavares, driving to the basket and getting the hoop and the harm. His three-point play gave Wareham its first lead, 3-2. 
    The Vikings extended the lead to 5-2 after Pina spun inside for the deuce. But Bedford went on a 10-3 run to take a 12-8 advantage. Wareham Coach Kevin Brogioli had seen enough and called a quick time out.
    After Bedford led 14-10, Wareham ended the quarter in style, with Darren Gray draining a foul-line jumper, the Vikings forcing a turnover, and Tavares calmly drilling a shake-and-bake 3-pointer from the top of the key with a second left of the clock.
    "That's the thing about this team, if somebody's not hitting on all cylinders somebody is there to pick them up," Wareham coach Kevin Brogioli said of his team's shaky start.
    Wareham slowly pulled further ahead in the second quarter. After a Bedford 3-pointer cut the Vikings lead to 20-17, the Tavares show continued. The senior guard slithered inside for another hoop. A few minutes later he banked home a trey, looking like he intended to do just that, to give Wareham a 29-19 advantage.
     On the other end Pina was just warming up. After disrupting shot after shot in the paint, he finally sent one back with fury, prompting a roar from the Wareham bench. It looked every bit as imposing when the replay was shown on the Jumbotron.
    The Vikings took a 36-26 lead into the locker room at halftime.  
    Tavares gave the Vikings a 13-point advantage a few minutes into the third quarter when he took off down the weakside, took a pass over the rim and slammed it home with both hands.
    "That's just sick," said one fan.
    "It's not fair," said another.
    Things turned a bit physical after that as every loose ball sent players scrambling in a scrum to the floor. Senior forward Pat Murphy picked up his fourth foul in the third quarter, forcing Brogioli to go to the bench once again. Bedford couldn't take much advantage of that, trimming only two points from the lead, 47-39, heading into the fourth quarter.
    "We were able to maintain that 10-point cushion even with three starters on the bench," Brogioli said.
    The final eight minutes belonged to Rezendes, who scored the 1,000th point of his career earlier in the season (Tavares did the same against Cardinal Spellmen in the Div. 3 South title game at UMass-Boston on Saturday). Rezendes found himself on a 2-on-1 in open court, which Tavares looking ready for liftoff on the other side. With a Bedford defender choosing to lean toward Tavares, Rezendes took in all the way home. A few plays later he powered down the lane for another basket and followed that with a short jumper, giving Wareham a 55-44 lead. 
    Pina then powered inside for another hoop. After hitting four straight from the line, Rezendes offered a hint of a smile as the Vikings extended the lead to 17, 61-44. The 14-5 run to open the quarter put the game away.
   "We'll take tomorrow off. They deserve it," Brogioli said. "They got banged around and banged up tonight."
    Brogioli said his team will be ready for Saturday.
    "They know what's at stake. They've had pressure on them all year long and they've come through all year long," he said.

 
 Read More ...
Robert Slager - 5 opinions posted

School Committee gives selectmen thumbs down

   The Wareham School Committee voted no confidence in the Board of Selectmen Wednesday night after members of the committee accused selectmen of interfering in their business and playing politics during election season.
    Last week Selectman Brenda Eckstrom offered a Power Point presentation during a selectmen meeting in which she questioned the need for cuts to school programs while school administrators were getting raises.
    That did not go over well with members of the School Committee, who have come under fire in recent months for their handling of the Health Care Trust Fund controversy. On Wednesday School Superintendent Barry Rabinovitch claimed that Eckstrom did not take into account pay increases based on promotions of school administrators.
    Eckstrom, who attended the School Committee meeting on Wednesday, was not allowed to speak on her behalf. School Committee chairman Bob Brousseau indicated that Eckstrom should have used the time allowed during Citizen’s Participation earlier in the meeting to address the committee.
    In an interview late Wednesday night, Eckstrom said she was stunned by the School Committee’s decision to vote no confidence in the Board of Selectmen, a move she termed "clearly politically motivated."
    "The School Committee has been attacking the selectmen for eight months," Eckstrom said. "And for them to sit there tonight and to try to accuse me of being political because I am trying to address the constituents that they are ignoring is both hypocritical and juvenile."
    Last summer the School Committee claimed there were issues with the town’s Health Care Trust Fund, which provides health insurance to town employees (the majority of which work for the school district). The School Committee hired the same auditor the town used for several years to audit the fund. Selectmen questioned the wisdom on such a decision, especially after that auditor did not have his contract renewed by the town.
    Selectmen hired a second auditor, who determined that town employees were not owed $1.9 million, as initially claimed by some Finance Committee and School Committee members.
    Eckstrom, a mother of four with three children in the school system, said her decision to address the school budget during the selectmen meeting on March 2 had nothing to do with politics.
    "I am fighting for people who work at the schools. I’m fighting for the teachers and the students and the parents. They don’t have enough paper for the children. My kids’ teachers have asked me not to buy them gifts at Christmas but instead purchase hand sanitizer for their classrooms. They are cutting everything, and it’s not just programs. For me it has always been about the children. The School Committee wants everyone to believe they couldn’t hire a superintendent for less than $150,000 a year. They sat there and accused me of being political while not even allowing me to speak in my defense. They were painted with politics throughout the whole meeting."
    Eckstrom then referenced a Standard-Times article on Wednesday in which Rabinovitch said Eckstrom "made assumptions with the wrong numbers" about administrative raises. Eckstrom denied that accusation, noting that Rabinovich himself received a $4,000 raise this year.
    "Rabinovitch is playing semantics to hide the fact that school administrators have been given raises while programs are being cut," she said. "The School Committee had an opportunity to keep salaries in check every time an administrative position became available. But they didn’t do it. Paying top dollar for a school superintendent in his first year in that position, in my opinion, is not financially responsible given the cuts in programs the school have seen."
    Eckstrom believes the vote of no confidence for the Board of Selectmen was done in retribution for her speaking out against the School Committee last week.
    "If these people want to be mad at me, be mad at me," Eckstrom said. "For them to attack the entire board is ridiculous. No one on the board knew what my presentation would include. I asked to be put on the agenda, as any citizen has the right to do, regardless if they are a town official or not. The School Committee is just playing politics, and that’s the last thing this town needs right now. We all need to work together for our children."

 Read More ...
Robert Slager - 8 opinions posted

Calling all cars - Police receive new cruisers

The new fleet of police cruisers
Calling all cars - Police receive new cruisers

   
Sgt. John Walcek of the Wareham Police Department stood in front of the police station Friday afternoon, his back to traffic on Route 28. A tall man, Walcek seemed to stand even taller as he surveyed a fleet of eight new police cars filling the station’s arched driveway. He tossed a rhetorical question into the air and then added the answer.
    “Is this impressive? Absolutely. State of the art. It brings us up finally to where we need to be,” he said.
    The fleet has been leased to Wareham for three years through a grant obtained by Police Chief Rick Stanley. The grant covers the cost for the first year. Stanley said after that the cost of the leases will be included in the police department’s budget for two years. If Town Meeting voters don’t approved the necessary funding, Stanley said he’ll find the money within whatever budget amount he is granted.
    “I had to sign that one in blood,” Stanley said with a grin.
    A lot of smiles flashed back and forth on Friday between Stanley and Bruce Sauvageau, chairman of the Board of Selectmen. Pride glistened in Stanley’s eyes when he glanced toward the gleaming fleet. He said Wareham’s police officers chose the cars. The choice was Crown Victorias or Chargers. The officers chose Chargers, adorned in black and white.
    Sauvageau told Stanley that in the seven years he’s been selectmen he’s never seen as many good things happen as he’s seen recently seen; not only in the police department, but in the town as well. Sauvageau noted the arrivals of new town accountant Elizabeth Zaleski, COA director and acting library director Marsha Griswold, CEDA director Christopher Reilly, and new town administrator Mark Andrews.
“We’re seeing positive movements, a direction we can be proud of,” Sauvageau said.
    “Since arriving in August I’ve met with nothing but cooperation from the department, the town and the community,” Stanley said. “I’ve had discussions about my vision. (Selectmen) have had some questions. They’ve held my feet to the fire.”
    Stanley glanced at the late afternoon sun casting gold across the roofline of the police station as his officers gathered together, their eyes set upon the cruisers.
    “It’s been good to be able to take something that was in this turmoil and do this,” Stanley said.
    “The change has been miraculous,” Sauvageau said.
    For a few minutes Sauvageau and Stanley joined other selectmen and police officers as they walked among the cars. Officers opened doors , turned on flashing blue lights, and then pointed to new equipment, which include 911 terminals that allow officers to file reports directly from their cars, radar equipment front and back (older vehicles only have front radar), state-of-the-art scanners, and a flash warning system that connects to the traffic lights in the mall area, resetting them so that cruisers in the process of emergency response can pass through the area without being impeded by traffic.
    Then one by one Stanley, Sauvageau and Andrews stepped up to a microphone to speak about the new fleet, a cooperative effort and a promise fulfilled.
    “I want to express to the community my appreciation for all of the support. Change does not come easily. I promised people when they came back in the spring they would see a new police force. This fleet is symbolic of the new police force,” Stanley said.
    Stanley looked from the selectmen to his officers, the gleaming cars, and beyond.
    “You deserve the best. I promise you will have the best,” Stanley said.
    Stanley closed his remarks with one final burst of appreciation.
    “I can’t thank enough the efforts of the board of selectmen, and especially chairman Sauvageau. I have worked closely with them. None of this would have been possible without them,” Stanley said.
    Stanley relinquished the microphone. Sauvageau and Andrews stepped forward, each echoing the town’s appreciation. Then the fleet (with selectmen, town administrator, and reporters as passengers) rolled onto Route 28 and across individually chosen routes for an official first tour of the town.
    Officer Michael Phinney, this reporter as his companion, guided a new cruiser through the center of town. There was a gasp from Phinney as a driver coming from the opposite direction, apparently distracted, started to swerve into Phinney’s lane.
    “Don’t be wiping out the new cruiser, lady,” Phinney said with a grin.

 
 Read More ...
Andrea Smith - 1 opinion posted

Dreaming with eyes wide open

In This Corner - Robert Slager
Dreaming with eyes wide open

    The dream still comes to me every few months. A small school from Northern California is punching a giant hole through a ceiling of belief. With their best player en route to the hospital, a victim of a flagrant elbow to the face that detached his retina, this motley group of young men leads the defending Division 2 State Basketball Champions by two points with just seconds remaining on the clock.
     The crowd behind the bench grows so loud the floor begins to vibrate. The best player in league history takes the ball as the clock winds down. He spins to his right near the corner. The crowd counts down.
    Five, four, three, two, one …
    The ball is in the air, a 73-game winning streak on the line. The greatest upset in league history hangs in the balance.
    The shot skids off the back rim. I grab the rebound and throw the ball to the rafters. I am mobbed by a team that was as close to me as family.
    On Monday at the TD North Garden, the Wareham High Vikings heard the echo of every screech from every sneaker on every gym floor that they’d stepped foot upon. They saw every rim on every playground that rested underneath a sun slipping from the sky. They were little boys again, stepping out on the parquet floor of the Garden, the same floor adorned with the invisible footprints of Bill Russell and Bob Cousy, Hondo and Bird, Ray Allen, Paul Pierce and Kevin Garnett.
    Pat Murphy looked up at the Jumbotron hanging high above center court for a moment. Jules Tavares looked out over the crowd. Jordan Rezendes watched a basketball move from his fingertips to the floor and back again.
    There was more at stake Monday afternoon that just the outcome of a basketball game. Yes, winning the Eastern Massachusetts Division 3 championship with a 63-49 victory over Bedford was a monumental achievement. Wareham was expected to be good heading into the season, but then Wareham is always expected to be good. Murphy, Tavares and Rezendes had all tasted post-season glory over the past few years, but the Vikings were never quite able to get over the hump in the South Section tournament. They never had the chance to play at the Garden. They were never able to get past their one-on-one tendencies when the game was on the line.
    But something changed this year. Head coach Kevin Brogioli said it perfectly when he noted on Monday “That’s the thing about this team - if somebody’s not hitting on all cylinders somebody is there to pick them up.” 
    Anyone fortunate enough to attend Monday’s game witnessed something remarkable. The Vikings have blown past most of their opponents this season with their traditional “don’t-blink-or-you’ll-miss-it” fast-break attack. Opposing team know they’re in for a track meet on sneakers every time Wareham steps on to the court. Extra oxygen hasn’t helped.
    But Bedford had little interest in letting Wareham open the flood gates. The Buccaneers decided to go toe-to-toe with the Vikings, throwing bodies around like human catapults. The game grew so physical that the referees stopped play several times to calm things down. Despite that, Bedford had succeeded in making Wareham play the Buccaneers’ game. The game turned into a war of attrition, just the way Bedford wanted it.
    What we all learned is that Wareham has a few warriors of its own.
    Ryan Pina was an absolute beast inside. The senior center contested every single shot while pulling down 22 rebounds, an astonishing number for a game of this magnitude. As bodies were flying all around him, Pina fought for the ball like it was the last slice of pizza at a fraternity party.
    If anyone ever questioned the heart that beats beneath those Wareham uniforms they got their answer. Murphy, who had hoped to join Tavares and Rezendes in the 1,000-point club on Monday, couldn’t hit water from a pier against Bedford. All but one of his shots spun painfully off the rim. But he found a way to help the Vikings win but playing some of the best defense this side of the National Guard. If there were a record for floor burns in one game Murphy would have his name etched on a plaque.
     Everyone else stepped up on the offensive end. Darien Fernandez scored four points in less than two seconds during one amazing sequence, leaving the Wareham crowd chanting “He’s a freshman, he’s a freshman.”
    The Bedford fans tried chanting something in response, only to be met by a sound wave of “Scoreboard! Scoreboad!”
    Nothing quiets opposing fans quite like that.
    In the game’s waning moments, when it became clear that Wareham would be heading for one final game – the Division 3 State Championship on Saturday in Worcester – Brogioli began to empty his bench. No matter how many minutes anyone played on this team this year they all shared the same dream – to play at the Garden just once in their lives. Brogioli, as classy a coach as you will ever hope to find, gave that dream to everyone on his team on Monday.
    But this dream isn’t over yet. If the Vikings win on Saturday they will be the Division 3 State Champions. And for the rest of their days, no matter where the road of the futures may lead them, no one will ever be able to take that dream away from them. They were part of something amazing. That will be with them always.
    It’s been more than 27 years now, and my dream still comes to me at night. In that dream a team from a tiny school in Northern California beats the defending state champions. But when I wake up my heart breaks a little bit every time because that 3-point shot did not skid off the rim. It went straight through the basket. A joyous mob did not engulf me. It formed in front of the other team’s bench. I fell to my knees and sobbed.
    I hope the Vikings never have to wake up from their dream.

 Read More ...
In This Corner - Robert Slager - 4 opinions posted

 Eckstrom blasts raises given to school administrators

Selectman Brenda Eckstrom
Eckstrom blasts raises given to school administrators

   
Apparently it’s not a good idea to suggest that selectmen don’t care about school children.
    During a School Committee budget meeting in January, School Superintendent Barry Rabinovich told those in attendance that if they didn’t like the proposed cuts to the school budget they should get out and vote.
    “Support someone who will put youth first,” he said.
    Selectman Brenda Eckstrom, a mother of four with three of her children in the Wareham school system, took offense at that politically charged remark. She finally responded on Tuesday with a Power Point presentation that showed the school budget wasn’t being decreased by $750,000 as had been suggested during the School Committee meeting in January. The proposed school budget ($26,586,684 for FY11) actually shows a requested increase of $950,719 (3.6 percent).
    Eckstrom doesn’t believe the level of cuts proposed in the school budget is necessary.
    "I am frustrated at the lack of supplies and the resources that we give our teachers and I'm also frustrated that when choices need to be made the children always come out on the short end," Eckstrom said.
    Eckstrom opened her presentation by noting that the top five school administrators have been continually getting raises while programs at the schools are being cut. She said she understands that the School Committee and not the Board of Selectmen is responsible for crafting the school budget but later told the Observer that she is dismayed as a mother that misinformation is being given to parents of school children.
    “This is about making choices,” she said. “This is about doing what’s right.”
    During her presentation Eckstrom said that the top five administrators at the school will be receiving raises this year, including the school superintendent. Those administrators received a combined salary of $583,139.44 in FY10, a raise of $20,471.44 from FY09 and an $83,181.44 increase from FY08.
    Eckstrom noted that bus drivers, custodians and cafeteria workers have received less than a 1 percent raise in their current union contract while teachers received a total of 3 percent over three years.
    “When everyone’s budget is tight, everyone needs to tighten their belts,” she said. “Sports activities are being cut and classrooms are running out of paper while the top five school employees are continuing to receive lucrative pay raises.”
    The school administration line item for FY11 shows a $95,000 increase. Rabinovich had previously failed to respond to an inquiry from the Observer asking him to explain the $95,000 increase and how much of it will go toward administrator raises. Eckstrom said the Board of Selectmen has not been given that information either.
    When asked by e-mail to comment for this story, Rabinovich finally responded in turn, writing (unedited) “I will wait to respond until I have a copy of Brenda Eckstrom Power Point. From what I have heard their were many misrepresentations of the Truth.”
    The Observer sent a subsequent e-mail that read: “You made several comments to Wareham Week this morning, Mr. Rabinovich. You were quoted as saying Eckstrom's figures regarding salary increases painted a false picture because of promotions among administrators. Could you please elaborate on that? Also, the line item for administration in the proposed FY11 budget shows a $95,000 increase. What is the reason for that?”
    Rabinovich responded by writing “My salary increased 4000. 10k for global connect, 66k for anticipated negotiations with custodians, cafeteria workers, teaching assistants, unit B. And administators. Approximately 16k for a retiring employee benefits.”
    Rabinovich later said these are contracted services through the superintendent's office.
    Rabinovich told Wareham Week that he will be receiving a 2.6 percent increase in 2011. He said that because the School Committee rated him “very good” during his evaluation he is entitled by contract to a $4,000 raise, which will push his FY11 salary to $153,140. Rabinovich also noted that salaries of administrators increased over the past few years because of promotions they received to replace administrators who left. Rabinovich was promoted two years ago when Jim Collins retired as superintendent.
    Information from the Department of Education web site, however, noted that almost 10 percent of the school's $340,988 budget increase in FY09 went toward raises for school administrators.
     During her presentation Eckstrom noted that superintendents in other communities have taken voluntary pay cuts to protect programs under their watch. The entire middle school sports program is facing elimination in the current proposed school budget.
    “The superintendent in Ware offered to put an addendum into her contract so she could take a 20 percent pay cut in FY10 in order to stave off layoffs,” Eckstrom said. “The superintendent in Springfield had deferred his contractual pay raises in order to save programs,”
    Eckstrom explained that the town currently spends the required amount mandated by the state for the school budget. Because of that any further reduction in state aid or any increase in school spending has to come from the town side of the budget. Eckstrom said in order to provide the school department the money it is seeking the town would have to find nearly $750,000 in its budget.
    “We would have to close data processing, the Council on Aging, the library and animal control,” Eckstrom said, offering one of several examples of the impact such an increase would have on town services.
    School officials have previously noted that a big financial issue for the district is yearly increases in fixed costs such as energy and insurance benefits. They said level funding actually represents a decrease in what can be spent on students, teachers and programs because of increases in fixed costs.
    Eckstrom said the School Committee needs to focus on areas of the budget to cut that don’t include programs for children. She noted that several questions she has asked of the School Committee have remained unanswered.
    “Did the person who took gate receipts and promised restitution ever pay? How much did he pay? When did he pay it? Where is the money that was left (to the school district) by the Minot teacher who passed away? What about the school van that was involved in an accident? What are the legal fees from that? I have no idea,” Eckstrom said.
    During last week’s selectmen meeting Eckstrom invited the School Committee to be present for her presentation. But according to School Committee Chairman Robert Brousseau a formal invitation via e-mail did not arrive until late Friday afternoon, which would not have allowed the School Committee to post a meeting of its board 48 hours in advance, as required by open meeting law.

 
 Read More ...
Robert Slager - 9 opinions posted

Wareham High principal leaving for Barnstable


   Patrick Clark, the principal of Wareham High School, will be leaving that position to become principal of Barnstable High School on July 1.
   Clark will take over for Patrica Graves, who is retiring from Barnstable High.
   Clark, who graduated from Barnstable High School in 1990, was selected by a search committee on Thursday. He, along with Barnstable High assistant principal John Mika and Falmouth High assistant principal James Demers, was a finalist for the position.  There were 18 applicants for the position overall.
    A search committee in Wareham will commence to choose a replacement for Clark. The Observer will update this story as more information becomes available.

 Read More ...
Robert Slager - 2 opinions posted

Woman killed in I-495 wreck

     Penelope H. Dickens, a 57-year-old Oak Bluffs woman, was killed Monday night in a one-car accident on Route 495 in Wareham.
   
According to State Police, the accident occurred around 8:10 p.m. when Dickens lost control of her 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee heading south near Exit 1. The vehicle swerved into the woods before bursting into flames.
   
Dickens was pronounced dead at the scene. The accident remains under investigation.

 Read More ...

LIVE CHAT!

Help drive the hate bloggers crazy!
LIVE CHAT!

   Please join us for LIVE CHAT Sunday beginning at 7 p.m. There's a lot to talk about as election season rages in Wareham! Please share your thoughts! Cheers!


 Read More ...
435 opinions posted

 Read More ...

 Read More ...

 Read More ...

News

Police Department's bark now every bit as bad as its bite

Wareham adds two police dogs
Police Department's bark now every bit as bad as its bite

    Police Chief Rick Stanley introduced his K-9 unit to selectmen on Tuesday night, and the two dogs brought to the meeting left quite and impression.
   Although muzzled, the animals – Cago and Rolf - snarled and barked at each other with fury.
  "They will have a tremendous deterrence effect to those who want to break into houses and cars," Stanley said.
  Stanley said some suspects are not intimidated by police officers. He doesn’t believe the same will be the case with the dogs.
  "Nobody wants to feel a bite on the leg from one of these guys," Stanley said.
  Stanley said the dogs are not yet fully trained.
  "When they’re fully trained and without muzzles they’ll be fine," Stanley said. 
  The animals are being trained by the Barnstable County Sheriff’s Department.
  The equipment for the dogs was purchased by San Diego Chargers linebacker Stephen Cooper, who played at Wareham High School in the late 1990s.
  Officer Joseph Cardoza and Michael Phinney will be working with Cago and Rolf. Cardoza played football with Cooper while at Wareham High.
   The Board of Selectmen thanked Cooper, who was not in attendance, for his generosity.
  According to Stanley, the dogs will also be of great assistance in searches for lost children and Alzheimer’s patients.

 Read More ...
Robert Slager

Gov. 101
    
  
 Selectmen met with representatives of A.D. Makepeace on Tuesday for their regularly scheduled quarterly report on Makepeace development.
    Selectmen were asked for assistance in acquiring state funding for a road at the entrance of the development (the Lou Avenue extension) in exchange for Makepeace using those savings to improve other aspects of the development.
    Selectmen Jane Donahue applauded Makepeace’s development plans, noting the number of new jobs such development will create. But she also reminded Makepeace to be mindful of environmental protection.
Makepeace has now completed all local permitting processes on its Tihonet development plans and expects to break ground on the first phase of the project next month.

 Read More ...

Obituaries
   
    Richard Paul “Dickie” Cruz, 86, of Dorchester, formerly of Wareham, died March 1, 2010 at home. He was the husband of Stella (Fonseca) Cruz and the son of the late John B. Cruz, Sr. and Caroline (Pina) Cruz.  He was born in Wareham and lived in Dorchester for many years.
    Cruz was an Army Veteran of WWII, serving in the American Theater, Asiatic Pacific Theater, & European African Middle Eastern Theater.
    Cruz founded the Pasadena Construction Company and served as its chief executive officer. He later worked as supervisor for his brother’s construction firm, John B. Cruz Construction Company, in Boston.  He also owned and operated “Rocky Manor,” a jazz club in Wareham, for many years and later developed townhouses on that property.
He was a member of the Dudley L. Brown V.F.W. Post 2846 in Onset, Youth Build Boston, and the Contractors Association of Boston.
    Cruz spent many summers on Martha’s Vineyard. His personal mantra was “love for family and live life to the fullest.”
    Survivors include his wife Stella (Fonseca) Cruz; his daughter,Cheryl A. Cruz Middleton and her husband William, of Altadena, CA; two granddaughters, Brandy Middleton and Megan Middleton, both of Altadena, CA; sister-in-law Tina Fonseca, of New Bedford; niece Marlene Sterling, of Melbourne, FL; his siblings Winifred Holford and Daniel “Sonny” Cruz, of Boston, Wilford “Fifi” Cruz, of Washington, D.C., Walter B. Cruz, Sr., of Wareham, and Andrea Rose, of Mattapoisett; and a host of nieces, nephews, cousins, other relatives, and many loving friends. He was the brother of the late Doris Vincent, Harold Cruz, Walter Cruz (the eldest), John “Bertie” Cruz, Jr., Priscilla Martin, Bertha May, Thelma Franklin, Gerald Pina, and Geraldine Pina.
    His funeral was held at 9 a.m. on Monday, March 8, 2010 at the Chapman, Cole & Gleason Funeral Home, 2599 Cranberry Hwy., (Rte.28), Wareham, followed by a Mass of Christian Burial at 10 a.m. in St. Mary’s Church, Onset. Burial followed  in St. Patrick’s Cemetery, Wareham. For directions and online guestbook, visit:
www.ccgfuneralhome.com.
 
     Christy Selby passed away on March 4 in Wareham. Her death was unexpected. She is survived by two children, Tia Marie, 20, and her son Phillip Jackson, 18.
    Selby was born in Dorchester on June 2, 1971. She graduated from Wareham High School in 1989 and attended Quincy College. She lived in Quincy for 15 years before back to Wareham in 2007. She lived Swifts Beach.
    She loved her children very much. She also enjoyed swimming, boating and motorcycles.
    She made friends very easily. She always made sure she kept in touch with everyone.
Selby is also survived by her sister Sheryl Salim of Wareham, her brother Brad Selby of Pennsylvania, her mother Sandra Lee Gardner, and her stepfather Harry Gardner, as well as many nieces and nephews.
    She is preceded by her father, Frank Selby.
    On her Facebook page she described herself as “down to earth, fun, exciting and driven person. I love seeing and doing different things, Harleys and real genuine people.Yes, being a bartender I am definitely a people person. I am undeniably a city girl but have decided to be closer to my family out here into what I call the sticks. It’s OK, though. Life is definitely what you make it. It works if you work it.”
    A memorial service is planned for Saturday, March 13, at 11 a.m. at St. Patrick’s in Wareham. A celebration of life will be held on March 28 at Fireflies in Quincy at 5 p.m.
Donations in her behalf can be sent to 67 Warr Ave., Wareham, 02571.
 
    Novilla P. (Jackson) Walker, 79, of Wareham, formerly of Randolph and Avon died Tuesday, March 9, 2010 at Good Samaritan Medical Center in Brockton.  She was the wife of the late Richard W. Walker, Sr.
    Born in Canada, the daughter of the late Florence (Fields) and Arthur Jackson, Sr., she graduated from high school in Dorchester.  Prior to her marriage, Mrs. Walker was employed for The Boston Globe in the classified ad department.  She was also a homemaker.
    Survivors include two daughters, Susan M. Moitozo of Marion and Nancy L. Yaras of Holbrook; two sons, Robert E. Walker of W. Wareham and Richard W. Walker, Jr. of Avon; a brother, Robert Jackson of Hampton, VA; seven granddaughters and four great grandchildren.
    Her funeral service will be held on Friday, March 12, 2010 in The Church of the Pines, 17 Carver Road, W. Wareham at 10 a.m. Interment will be in the Mass. National Cemetery, Bourne.  Visiting hours will be Thurs. at the Chapman, Cole & Gleason Funeral Home, 2599 Cranberry Highway (Rt. 28) Wareham from 5 – 8 PM.
    For directions and on-line guestbook visit:
www.ccgfuneralhome.com


 Read More ...

Building inspector: Bob Brady ran dog grooming business without proper license

    Former selectman and current political activist Bob Brady appeared before the Zoning Board of Appeals recently to answer claims that he has been running a dog grooming business on his property without the appropriate license.
    Brady contested that accusation, saying that he holds a kennel license and believes that should be sufficient to allow him to conduct a grooming business.
    Acting Building Inspector Jay Collins disagreed. He said a commercial kennel license is necessary for Brady to conduct a grooming business on his property in Wareham.
    The issue came to light after Brady began advertising for dog grooming services in an advertisement in Wareham Week.
    At Brady’s request ZBA Chairman Ken Ferriera read the town by-law definition for a kennel into the record. The definition included three kennel categories: small with four-five dogs; hobby with less than 11 dogs, some breeding, and limited litter sales and commercial, which in addition to allowing breeding and litter sales includes grooming.
    Ferriera asked if Brady had received a letter of ruling on the complaint from Collins. Brady said he had not. Ferriera told Brady that a hearing can not be conducted until a ruling has been made. Collins, present for the hearing, indicated he would make such a ruling and provided a written copy of it the nest day.
    Ferriera informed Brady that after Collins put the ruling in writing Brady had two options: He could either appeal the ruling or apply for the special permit for a commercial license. 

 Read More ...
Andrea Smith - 2 opinions posted

The Buzz Read More ...

Political Corner
    A fund-raiser hosted by the Committee to re-elect John Donahue, Town Moderator will be held on Thursday, March 11 from 6-9 p.m. at Stevie’s Pier View Restaurant, 201 Onset Avenue.
    Donahue will meet, greet, and answer questions. Refreshments will be served. Donations of any amount will be gratefully accepted. For further information or to send a contribution, contact the Committee to Re-elect John Donahue, P.O. Box 426 Onset, Massachusetts 02558.
 
    Please join John Cronan at his re-election campaign cocktail party. Light Hors D’oeuves will be served at Baily’s Surf and Turf, 3056 Cranberry Highway, Monday, March 15, 2010, from 6-8 p.m. $25 per ticket. Cash bar.
    For tickets call (508) 291-0006 or at the door.

    There will be a fund-raiser for Mary Ann Silva’s reelection bid for Wareham Town Clerk at Steve’s Pierview Restaurant located at 201 Onset, Ave. Onset, on March 17 between 6-10 p.m. Refreshments and musical entertainment will be provided.
 
     Selectman Bruce Sauvageau, who is seeking re-election, would like to invite local residents to Lindsey’s Family Restaurant on Sunday, March 21 between 5-7 p.m.
Complimentary buffet dinner will be served. Sauvageau said questions will be welcomed and asks that all  donations to his campaign be directed toward to the Wareham Cape Verdean Cultural Center please.
    
 
 Read More ...

Observer Publisher Robert Slager named 2009 Citizen of the Year

Elks leader Dave Carson presents Observer publisher Robert Slager with the 2009 Citizen of the Year award Saturday night.
Observer Publisher Robert Slager named 2009 Citizen of the Year

    
Observer Media President and Publisher Robert Slager has been named the 2009 Citizen of the Year by the Elks of Wareham.
     Slager received the Elks' “Distinguished Citizenship Award” during a dinner award banquet Saturday night at the Wareham Lodge of Elks.
     Slager, who lives in Halifax with his wife Liza and daughters Sara and Nicole, is not a member of the Order of the Elks. His proud family was in attendance on Saturday.
    Dave Carson introduced Slager, saying “The award that really means the most is our citizen of the year award, the most distinguished citizen, given this year to Robert Slager of the Observer.”
    Carlson presented a plaque to Slager for “outstanding and meritorious service to humanity.”
    Slager said he was deeply humbled by the honor.
    “It's because it comes from you, the Elks, one of the most charitable organizations in Wareham,” he said.
    Slager then thanked Andrea Smith, calling her the heart and soul of the Observer.
     “We never would have made it this far without you,” Slager said.
    Then Slager thanked his wife.
    “They say behind every good man is a strong woman. You must be Hercules for standing beside me for this long,” he said.
    Then Slager’s eyes fell on his 9-year-old daughters, seated in the front row.
    “Sara and Nicole, I want you to remember this night. I want you to understand the importance of being good citizens, to do all the things the people in this organization do. That would make me very proud.”
    Afterward, Slager said he had been contacted by Carson last month about the award.
    “I was deeply moved by this honor, but I wanted to make sure that Mr. Carson and the Elks understood that I do not live in Wareham,” Slager said. “He told me he would check with other members to make sure it was OK. It’s really humbling that they made this choice considering I am not a member of their organization and that I don’t live in town.”
    Slager said he was very grateful to have the chance to share the moment with his wife and daughters.
    “I really wanted my daughters to be here,” he said. “The Observer has not been easy on my family. I wanted my girls to understand that being a good citizen can mean even more than making a lot of money.”
    Slager said it was equally important to share the moment with his wife.
    “She has been the rock behind this family,” he said. “I know that the Observer has made her life difficult. She has never fully understood why it’s so important to me to try to help this community because she has never breathed Wareham the way I have. I think she finally understands.”
    Liza Slager said she is extremely proud of her husband.
    “It was wonderful that they thought to honor him for all his good work,” she said.

 Read More ...
Andrea Smith - 37 opinions posted

Setting the Facebook record straight once and for all

Dear readers,
 
      Over the past two weeks a group of individuals representing the local political group Take Back Wareham has publicly accused me of creating a Facebook page in order to view pictures of underage children. This sickening accusation has absolutely no basis in fact and must be addressed immediately.
      A little more than two weeks ago I created a Facebook page under the user name Wareham Observer, assuming people may know that name better than my own. The intention of the page was to create a community forum accessible to anyone with a Facebook account. The page has become exactly what I hoped it would be – a place where people could share thoughts, photos and stories while also promoting events, local business and charities. There is absolutely no objectionable content on the page. I invite everyone to view the page by following this link:
 
http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100000711579213#!/profile.php?id=100000711579213
    Almost immediately after the page was created, individuals from Take Back Wareham tried to force Facebook to remove it. They claimed the page should have been set up differently – as a business page instead of a personal one - but I chose the format used by the Wareham JROTC, the Wareham Color Guard, the Wareham Middle School PTA, and the Wareham Junior Basketball Association because the Facebook page is not about the Wareham Observer. It’s a forum that I created to promote the community, not the Observer. The page does not contain advertising or subscription offers. I don’t even list a phone number for Observer Media. Please visit the page to confirm that.
    Will Take Back Wareham now go after the Wareham JROTC, the Wareham Color Guard, the Wareham Middle School PTA, and the Wareham Junior Basketball Association?
    After Facebook received numerous complaints from Take Back Wareham members I decided to change my Facebook user name to Robert Slager. I did that to ensure there was no way anyone could claim the page was somehow misrepresenting its intention. I assumed that would be the end of this nonsense, but I was mistaken.
    After Take Back Wareham failed in its attempt to have the page removed its members began to publicly accuse me of being a “pervert” for allowing “underage” children access to the page. Furthermore they claimed I intentionally set the page up as a “personal” account rather than as a “business” account in order to gain greater access to private photographs of children.
    This is where I draw the line. These are absolutely shameful allegations. For the record, Facebook has declined to remove the page, ruling that the page in no way violates its terms of service. I have not received a single phone call, e-mail or letter from anyone complaining about the page. The only complaints have come from members of Take Back Wareham, many too cowardly to use their real names.
    Facebook has more than 130 million personal pages. Every single person who has a personal account can view anything made public on another member’s page. According to Take Back Wareham’s logic that means more than 130 million people set up personal accounts because they are “perverts” seeking photos and information about children. Most of the members of Take Back Wareham have personal pages. Are they "perverts" as well?
     Anyone who has a Facebook account knows that the program makes “friend” suggestions. In the first few days I took advantage of this feature, sending out invitations to members of the Wareham High School football team, which I have been covering for years. Then I quickly received hundreds of requests to join from people throughout Wareham. Many Facebook members do not list their ages in their profiles and often use non-identifying photos (such as celebrities) on their pages, but knowing that Facebook does not allow anyone under 13 to have an account I accepted every single request to join.
    This is nothing more than a politically-motivated attack against me and the Observer. The reason is clear. Take Back Wareham, now also operating under the name VoteApril6, has made a concerted effort to get their political message into the school system. In 16 days nearly 700 people have joined my Facebook page. In eight months the Take Back Wareham Facebook page still has fewer than 300 members. It is obvious that these people somehow view my Facebook page as a threat to their political ambition and they are trying to get it removed or to discredit it by any means necessary.
     My Facebook page doesn’t debate local politics. It’s a forum in which people can promote the community. If the Take Back Wareham people really cared about the community the way they claim they would support such an effort. But they have made it clear time and time again that they will try to silence all voices other than their own.
     I know I am outspoken on local issues. Any criticism directed at me for that is not only welcomed but encouraged. But these baseless claims that I am some sort of “pervert” and "sexual predator" for creating a Facebook page are not only an attack on me but an attack on my family. My wife is a Brownie troop leader. My daughters are nine years old. To try to label me a “pervert” for purely political reasons is the most disgusting thing I have ever witnessed. I have never done anything to harm a child, nor would I. I have never been arrested for anything in my entire life.
    I call on the good people of Wareham to say "enough is enough" to those people within Take Back Wareham who are responsible for this shameless personal attack. There are some lines that must never be crossed.

- Robert Slager
 
 Read More ...
21 opinions posted

 Read More ...

 Read More ...

Commentary

Cheers and Jeers
Cheers and Jeers

    Dr. Barry Rabinovitch –
This is a rare boomerang jeer. In a Standard-Times article this week the superintendent of the Wareham School District took the art of spinning to an entirely new level. He was quoted as saying “I’m not sure what (Selectman Brenda Eckstrom) meant when she said the school budget is being cut $750,000 by the town.”
    Rabinovitch was referring to comments Eckstrom made during recent selectmen meeting. The only problem is Eckstrom said exactly the opposite of what Rabinovitch claims she did. Eckstrom took Rabinovitch to task for suggesting during a School Committee meeting in January that the town was cutting the school budget by $750,000. The Observer covered that School Committee meeting. Rabinovitch clearly conveyed to parents in attendance that the town had cut the school budget by $750,000 when in fact the proposed school budget shows an increase of nearly $1 million. Rabinovitch went to far as to tell parents they should vote for officials who care about children, which is what Eckstrom took offense over in the first place.
    If that wasn’t shameful enough, Rabinovitch actually has the audacity to try to put his words in Eckstrom’s mouth. Everyone who witnessed that School Committee meeting knows what Rabinovitch said. Everyone who witnessed the selectmen meeting knows what Eckstrom said. The only confusion here is in Rabinovitch’s head.
    The school superintended also said Eckstrom “made assumptions with the wrong numbers” when she said school administrators received raises as programs were being cut. He claims she didn’t take into account promotions received by school administrators.
This issue was addressed in last week’s Wareham Observer. Rabinovitch will receive a 2.6 percent increase in 2011. He said that because the School Committee rated him “very good” during his evaluation he is entitled by contract to a $4,000 raise, which will push his FY11 salary to $153,140. Information from the Department of Education web site notes that almost 10 percent of the school’s $340,988 budget increase in FY09 went toward raises for school administrators.
    It’s one thing for Rabinovitch to try to spin things for his benefit. It’s quite another when he tries to spin things for the detriment of a selectman with three children in the Wareham School District. 
    He should be ashamed of himself.


 Read More ...
1 opinion posted

Crystal Ball
Crystal Ball Read More ...

Moving toward the middle on CRC proposal

In This Corner - Robert Slager
Moving toward the middle on CRC proposal

   As readers of the Observer know, I have been opposed to changing the form of Wareham’s town government. While I understand the frustration of town officials who work very hard to move projects forward only to be thwarted by special interest voting blocks at Town Meeting, I haven't been able to get past a few simple questions: Is the system itself broken or is the real villain voter apathy? Do the proponents of warrant articles bear at least some responsibility for failing to get more people to support their proposals at Town Meeting? If Town Meeting works in other communities, why can’t it work in Wareham?
    Over the past few weeks I have begun to waver on my viewpoint. And not for the reason some of you may expect.
    Supporters of the plan have yet to sell me on the idea. In fact, I remain troubled by the process taken by the Charter Review Committee. In the early stages of this debate I wrote a scathing column about the CRC’s decision to immediately pursue a change in the form of government and then try to sell it to the public after the fact. It seemed more than just a bit disingenuous for the CRC to seek public input when its members decided in their first meeting to delay discussing changes to the charter in favor of wholesale changes to the form of government. While it may have been legal for the CRC to do so, it has proven to be a public relations disaster. It gave opponents of the idea the opportunity to attack the CRC itself rather than debate the merits of what the CRC was actually proposing.
    The CRC didn’t help itself much last week when chairman Alan Slavin told selectmen his committee will bring the issue to Town Meeting regardless of the results of a non-binding referendum on changing town government that will be placed on the April 6 election ballot. That’s also pretty disingenuous. If the non-binding referendum shows strong support for changing the form of government, supporters of the plan will no doubt use that information to their benefit at Town Meeting, as they should. But if there is little support for the referendum the CRC should immediately abandon the idea and get back to reviewing the charter. Otherwise the referendum is meaningless and is only being offered by the CRC as a tool for the group's benefit.
    But what has troubled me greatly is the inability, or unwillingness, of opponents of the plan to offer a fair, coherent argument against changing Wareham’s form of government. In fact, there has been so much misinformation and factual distortions offered by these people that I have begun to wonder why they refuse to engage in an actual debate about the relatives merits of a mayoral/city council system verses the current selectmen/town administrator/town meeting system.
    Both Wareham Week and the Wareham Courier allowed Take Back Wareham supporter Peter Baum to write a six-part series titled “Why You Should Fear Political Consolidation in Wareham.” Baum's entire argument was absurd. Forgetting for a moment that Baum applied for a position on the Charter Review Committee and was rejected (a fact neither paper ever acknowledged), his premise made no sense. He claimed the move to change the form of government was just a power play by the selectmen to gain more control. A mayoral system featuring 11 city councilors would have the exact opposite effect. An elected mayor, for all intents and purposes, would basically function as the current unelected town administrator now does. He or she would essentially be the CEO of the town of Wareham. The 11 elected city councilors would make policy as the five elected selectmen do now. How would such a system give the current selectmen more power? The power would be in the hands of more people. And any selectman wishing to run for either mayor or councilman would still have to be elected.
    In his series, Baum never actually got around to debating which system of government would best benefit the people of Wareham. His final conclusion was that the system doesn’t need to change. The current Board of Selectmen and the town moderator need to be replaced. Yes, a six-part series, published in both Wareham Week and the Wareham Courier and written by a person with a possible ax to grind for not being chosen for the CRC, concluded by saying that Take Back Wareham candidates should be elected to office.
    That’s the real problem. Opponents of changing Wareham’s form of government aren’t interested in weighing the actual benefits of doing so. For them this is all about politics and power.
    They are terrified that one of their political opponents will be elected mayor. They shiver at the thought of a Mayor Donahue, a Mayor Sauvageau or a Mayor Eckstrom, even though anyone elected to such a position would need the majority of support from Wareham voters. A Mayor Brady would face the same challenge. It would be up to the will of the people of Wareham to decide who would best serve in that position. That’s how true democracy works.
   But the Take Back Wareham crowd doesn’t want to take that chance. They seem to care about democracy only when it suits their political interests to do so. On one hand these people argue that Town Meeting works fine because issues are decided by the will of the people who attend. But at the same time they oppose non-binding referendums that would poll the opinion of a wider selection of residents. They won’t even discuss the merits of eliminating Town Meeting because they know their voting block currently gives them political power, and they will fight tooth-and-nail to preserve it. They haven’t been able to win at the ballot box in recent years when more voices are heard. That’s why they are fighting so hard to protect Town Meeting. It has nothing to do with the best interest of Wareham. It’s all about protecting their special interest political turf.
    That’s also why these people are working so hard to kill the notion of changing Wareham’s government as quickly as possible. If it gets past Town Meeting, all of Wareham will be able to vote on the issue during next year’s town election. That’s the thing these people fear the most. They fear that the majority of people in Wareham will chose to support their political opponents. That’s why I laugh every time I hear a Take Back Wareham person invoke the word democracy.
    Their arguments have grown absolutely ridiculous now. Take Back Wareham supporters are now claiming the wording of the non-binding referendum on changing the form of government is confusing and could lead to “yes” votes by people who oppose members of the current administration.
    This is how the referendum reads: “The current form of government consists of five part-time selectmen, an appointed town administrator, and an open town meeting. Do you feel the current form of government is working in the best interests of the town? Yes or No.”
    That seems pretty clear to me. Just to make sure I read the referendum word-for-word to my nine-year-old daughter Sara and asked her what she thought it meant. She said the question was about “if people like the way town government is set-up right now, and if people wanted to change the way the government was set-up.” I asked her if it was about the people running the town right now. She said no. It was about the way things were “set-up.”
    My third-grade daughter got it.
    Supporters of changing the form of government in Wareham haven’t sold me with their arguments. But the opponents of this plan have finally put me on the fence with their nonsensical arguments and clear motivation to preserve their political power at the expense of everyone else.
    I do know one thing, though. This issue should pass Town Meeting. It should be decided by as many voters as possible. The only way for that to occur is at the ballot box.
    If opponents truly believe in democracy this is the only way to ensure it.
 
 Read More ...
In This Corner - Robert Slager - 9 opinions posted

Letters to the Editor

    TO THE EDITOR:
    On April 6, an election will be held to fill two selectman seats and other open positions. On April 26, Town Meeting will take place. Your participation is very much needed.
    Local politics deserves your attention. This town has become a political hot potato with controversies galore, some real and some contrived. I give the current Board of Selectmen (BOS) a lot of credit for recent decisions they’ve made. They appointed a very capable town administrator, police chief, town accountant, and COA director. They established a computer use audit, and they steadily worked through the potential health care funding problem.
    The current BOS are not perfect. They publicly acknowledged unintentional procedural neglect in not following the open meeting law, and they have expressed the need for more respectful communication, starting with themselves.
    It’s my opinion that some in our community are determined to tear down anything the BOS are trying to build, whether it makes sense to do so or not. An example is the Westfield matter, where a proposed senior housing development was voted down at the last Town Meeting in a close vote. If you had been there, your vote could have made a difference for our seniors. This issue is now on the ballot on the April 6 election.
    The circus came to town at the previous Town Meeting. Disrupters convened at the back of the high school auditorium, as they have done countless times before, and proceeded to intimidate some attendees and high school kids counting ballots. Some even tried to have their votes counted multiple times. Selectman candidate Frank DeFelice actually went to the microphone and called another Town Meeting voter a “Bozo.” Do you want someone like that representing you? Please. I am hoping that more police security is added at the next Town Meeting, so that a situation like this does not happen again. 
    Many of the same town meeting disrupters held a private “community” meeting in a public building last summer, and if you did not agree with their premise you were not allowed to attend. If you somehow got into the public building and refused to leave when Bob Brady demanded that you do so, you were not allowed to speak. BOS members and others who attended were silenced at a meeting in a public building. What? I say, enough already!
    What can you do? Read about what’s happening in our Town. Ask questions. Vote on April 6 and attend Town Meeting. Stand up for yourself and for your town. Don’t let a small group of adults who act like spoiled children hijack the town meeting process. Help to bring peace back to Wareham. This contribution from you will earn dividends by helping to make our town - your town - a much better place to live.
 
Joe Macdonald
Wareham
 
TO THE EDITOR:
    I myself am taking a second look at whether our present form of government needs to be changed, left as is, or perhaps just modified. My mind was not fully closed on the idea of change, I just tend to lean against change. An age thing I guess, and the word “mayor” seems too alien to this second generation “townie.”
    The outcome of the non-binding question on Westfield will show me if Town Meeting is actually and truly representative of the peoples will as a whole or not. This is something I need and reluctantly want to know so I can make a decision that is knowledgeable and not based on emotion or fear.
    The detractors on this question have me questioning their motives, especially when implying that non-binding questions are un-democratic and fly in the face of their vote at Town Meeting. Not good reasoning to use as most of the detractors on this question where/are a vocal part of recall efforts of past, including Mr. Baum. A recall would have been binding though, so using the same logic as those opposed to the non-binding question, it would over-turn the will of the people that voted in the original election. 
    Again, that’s using their logic.
    Mr. Baum appears to have a tremendous problem with non-binding questions and any change to our form of government as it stands today. His arguments against are based solely on persons, events and a few selective stats that shed a favorable light when needed. His arguments in his series of ‘guest’ columns seem to be based on the process of the CRC and not on the actual merits pro/con of any change of our government as I was led to believe it would entail and should have been labeled for what it actually was so as not to mislead others.
    This leads me to question if Mr. Baum’s views would be the same if all the incumbents were re-elected in April.
    Mr. Jones and the members of the CRC, I applaud your work on this and the way you have made your points and freely answer questions without bring personalities into it, even after having been personally attacked in the media and blogs. I plainly see that your groups motive in this is for better government and representation of the people as a whole and nothing more.
 
Joseph Leggett
Wareham


TO THE EDITOR:
    Peter Baum’s allegation that our town moderator, John Donahue, is neither fair nor objective is both incorrect and unsubstantiated and needs to be addressed. 
    As a Town Meeting member I have witnessed Mr. Donahue’s deft handling of many issues ranging from simple inquiries regarding the rules of order to the outright unruly behavior of his detractors and their recent attempts to taint voting procedures at Town Meeting.  Mr. Donahue has always maintained a calm, focused attitude, and his clear sense of neutrality and impartiality has steadily grown for the past decade that he has served as our Town Moderator.  Because of his excellent interpersonal skills and his considerable parliamentary and legal expertise, his guidance of the deliberative legislative body that is our town meeting has oftentimes looked easy.  It isn’t.  Making rulings and decisions ‘on his feet’ while maintaining decorum at the same time requires great concentration and a unique ability to remain undistracted.
    Any unbiased observer of Town Meeting would have to agree that Mr. Donahue has demonstrated the Patience of Job and at other times he has displayed the Wisdom of Solomon in dealing with the multiple challenges of being an even-handed Moderator.
Clearly in the last three years our town has become more politically charged and economically challenged. Rulings by the moderator need to be legal, rational, and always impartial, even if unpopular with Town Meeting members. Mr. Donahue has been the consummate professional and a tactful, amiable voice of moderation. Now more than ever, we need a truly independent, knowledgeable, and experienced Moderator to assist us with our deliberations; one who will always act in the best interests of the town. The job is so much more than a popularity contest.
    To paraphrase the American Indian proverb:  Mr. Baum should walk a mile in Mr. Donahue’s moccasins before making untrue allegations about his professionalism.
 
Tom Monaghan
West Wareham
 
TO THE EDITOR:
    Bon Appétit and Martha Stewart Living both enjoy a robust national readership, but their influence in Wareham is marginal when compared to local newspapers.
    This is not to suggest area residents prefer reading the police blotter to sitting down before a well-executed bœuf bourguignon.
     Nevertheless, judging from the short supply of weekly papers in one shop last Monday, few would deny there’s a voracious appetite for homegrown news, puff pieces and tales of political intrigue.
     The town’s newest publication, WarehamWeek, also boasts an interactive Web site where some feisty pundits recently engaged in a back-and-forth over the merits of a proposed senior housing complex at Westfield.
     They posted their comments in reaction to Larry McDonald’s guest opinion column in the newspaper. Those weighing in included three well-known community stalwarts and McDonald himself.
     While the article itself provided little more than what we have come to expect from this inveterate spin doctor, questions remain as to why it garnered any attention in the first place. Half a dozen activists made 64 comments over the span of a weekend.
     When tensions escalated, as they often do when certain individuals in town take to the podium, the site moderator had to step into the arena to quell personal attacks and keep the conversation on topic.
     Politics can be fodder for dissension, even among one’s own flesh and blood, and sometimes the best tack is simply not to go there.
     Because when grown men argue over whose facts are straight and which family tree has deeper roots, it begs the question whether Wareham aficionados can ever find true common ground when they’re so intent on firing spitballs during an online debate.
     A gift subscription to Bon Appétit awaits McDonald in exchange for his silence from now until after Town Meeting. Fat chance that will happen.
 
Christopher Gay
Onset
 
TO THE EDITOR:
    I am writing to urge Wareham voters to take part in our local election, which is less than a month away. I also urge voters to mark their ballots for John Donahue for moderator.
For almost 10 years he has been serving us fairly and calmly. When lesser people have indulged in disruptive provocation at Town Meeting, John has held steady, moving us through the complications of our lengthy Town warrants. He continually is initiating new measures to make the process more understandable and manageable.
    I can’t imagine how we ever got through an evening before he introduced the visual timer for speakers.
    I am also grateful for his introductory lesson at each meeting concerning what various phrases and rules mean.
    I want him up there on the podium, and I hope he gets overwhelming support from this town that he has served so well.
 
Sean Carmody
West Wareham
 
TO THE EDITOR:
    I recently read a tri-fold brochure for the Claire Smith campaign for Town Moderator for Wareham.
    In this document she claims to be “inclusive.” I wish to remind people of my experience with Ms Smith’s form of moderating and of inclusivity.
     I attended an early meeting of the Citizens for a Better Wareham crowd when it was being touted as a meeting for people who wanted to talk about improving the government of Wareham because I do support improving our town government. At that meeting I volunteered to join a group to come up with questions to be addressed to the Selectmen. I was told by Ms. Smith personally that to be on that committee it was not necessary to agree with the ideas of some of the others who had spoken that evening.
     The next day Geoff Swett called me and asked pointed questions about my beliefs. When he heard that I thought the selectmen were doing a pretty good job he dis-invited me from the committee.
     I called Ms. Smith to ask if he had that authority. She agreed with him.
     What I take from this experience is that if Ms Smith became the Town Moderator we should have no trust that she would be fair at Town Meetings, that she would make room for any of us who disagree with her own views.
     She has shown that, contrary to what she advertises, she is not inclusive.
 
Kate Furler
Wareham

 Read More ...
1 opinion posted

Why this matters so very much to me

In This Corner - Robert Slager
Why this matters so very much to me

   
A thin sheen of sweat covered Gary’s face, almost like wax from a candle flickering near its end. To say he was white as a ghost doesn’t quite capture it. His skin was a light shade of gray, stretching down over his pronounced cheekbones. His eyes were soft and moist, staring upward toward the ceiling, to somewhere beyond, to a place only he could see.  
    I held his hand like I had so many times before. But this time his hand was cold, his grip nearly non-existent. But I just couldn’t let go.
    He was there for me the first day I walked into the San Francisco Examiner. He saw a young, green cocky kid ready to change the world, a kid wound so tight he could cut a diamond with his teeth. He was there for me the day I almost quit journalism after the Examiner killed a story I had written about a young solider just home from Desert Storm, a solider who had been robbed blind by a business that advertised in the paper. And Gary was there for me every single moment after a cerebral aneurism ripped the woman I loved away from me. 
    The beep of the machine to the left of Gary’s hospital bed began to slow. Suddenly his head turned toward me, the hint of a smile crossing his lips.
    With the din of the AIDS hospice seemingly closing in from all sides, Gary began to whisper. I leaned in as close as I could, so close I could feel his breath on my ear.
    He told me he had no regrets. He told me that despite watching his friends die one by one he wouldn’t have changed a thing. He told me he lived the only life he could. He lived the life he loved.
    Then he told me to leave the Examiner, to make a difference, to be the person I was the day I first walked into that newsroom.
    “Live the life you love,” he said.
    He made me promise that I would. I gave him my word.
    It was the only time I ever saw a tear in his eye.
    Then I leaned over and kissed this amazing man on the forehead and said goodbye.
    Gary had given me the authority to decide when to stop heroic measures to keep him alive. I stopped at the hospital room door, took one last look at a man I loved like a brother, and told the doctor to let him go.
    The date was July 4, 1993.
    Independence Day.
    For nearly 17 years I have done all that I can to keep the promise I made to him. He was the bravest man I have ever known. He took care of everyone in his circle of friends as an insidious disease slowly tore their bodies apart. He never wavered. He never faltered. He forced himself to stay strong even as his world was collapsing all around him.
    But it was more than that. He was utterly selfless. Once he was rushed to the hospital after contracting one of his many bouts of pneumonia. I remember visiting him a few days later. He couldn’t speak through his oxygen mask. He motioned for me to move closer. In my palm, with his finger, he wrote “How’s Josephine?”
    It was the first time I cried in front of another man.
    Gary once told me that people leave an echo of themselves in the soul of everyone they meet. For me, his echo remains as loud today as it has ever been.
    It’s so ironic. When I met him I was raging homophobe who had once told a college roommate I would never live with a fag. Then I packed my things and moved out.
    Perhaps that’s the reason I find hatred so pitiable in others. I was once so narrow-minded that I almost denied myself the chance to know a person like Gary. His memory is the one thing that has kept me from becoming cynical. He is the reason that I learned to never stop fighting against the hatred in this world, to always try to make a difference, no matter how small it may seem.
    I know now I will never change the world. But that doesn’t matter to me anymore. Perhaps it’s enough just to be willing to endure the hatred from those who will do or say anything to prevent the truth from being told. Perhaps it’s enough to create a tiny ripple in a community I have grown to love. If that inspires some people to do the same then that ripple may one day becomes a wave, a wave that can move Wareham forward toward the future it so richly deserves.
    So I ask you all now, please stand together against the hatred in this community. Please make your voices heard. Tell your friends and tell your neighbors that your town deserves better than this. Don’t turn your backs on the senior citizens living in squalor. Reach out to the homeless families living in the woods. End the corruption that has drained Wareham’s ability to protect the most vulnerable of its citizens. Preserve your water supply, if not for you then for your children, and their children as well. Tell the people engaged in petty politics and personal vendettas that they are poisoning the very town they claim to love.
    Make a difference. Whisper it as a promise. It will give you strength that you never dreamed you had.


 Read More ...
In This Corner - Robert Slager - 9 opinions posted

Town meeting "democracy" in Wareham

Down the Road - Andrea Smith
Town meeting "democracy" in Wareham

   
In last week’s edition of Wareham Week, Larry McDonald’s guest column was, shall we say, provocative.
    I don’t know if McDonald wrote the headline or it was done by someone on staff at Wareham Week, but I have to tell you I found it ironic at best and maybe just a little bit funny.
    “In voters we (don’t) trust.” That’s the headline (the hook if you will) someone chose for a piece of writing that criticizes selectmen for wanting (are you ready for this?) every single voter in Wareham to have an opportunity to be free of intimidation, insult, and physical discomfort. That’s the headline that addresses a non-binding referendum that would allow a wide array of residents to express their opinion regarding the possibility of 200 units of affordable senior housing on the town-owned Westfield property.
    McDonald suggests that Bruce Sauvageau’s support of a Westfield referendum indicates the selectman has no regard for the legislative branch of government.
    “There is nothing more insulting than an elected official telling the citizens he has no regard for the legislative branch of our government. To hell with democracy!” McDonald wrote.
    McDonald has it all wrong. “To hell with democracy” doesn’t describe Sauvageau. It describes the very loud and obviously orchestrated faction of voters that disrupted and distorted the democratic process during last fall’s Town Meeting.
    I know this because I was seated right next to them. It was the darkest side of small town politics that I have ever seen.
    Be assured, experience allows me to make comparisons. I’ve attended town meetings in Needham, Marion, Mattapoisett and Rochester, as well as in Wareham, where I have lived for quite some time. Not once in any of those towns have I seen anything like what I witnessed during debate of the Westfield issue last fall.
    First there was the gathering of the troops in a room at Wareham High School shortly before Town Meeting began. Then the impossible-to-miss mass of people filed into the upper left-hand side of the high school auditorium. One group sat in the first aisle while the rest filled in each subsequent row behind that. The group extended all the way to the top of the auditorium, where many of them chose to stand. I saw with my own eyes how those standing at the top left-hand side of the auditorium shifted over to stand behind the rows in the middle in order to have their vote counted twice.
    I saw them wink at other members of the group. I saw them pat each other on the back. I had never seen anything like it before.  
    Prior to that I sat and listened to distortion after distortion made by members of this group. Someone falsely stated a deed restriction prevented affordable housing from being built on Westfield. Someone claimed Westfield was too far from town for seniors but failed to mention that five well-populated senior-only mobile home parks lie within similar or greater distance from the town (and that GATRA had agreed to provide service to the property). A person attacked an RFP received for Westfield but failed to mention four more advantageous proposals that were also received by the town. They said the town should focus on improving Agawam Village, knowing full well that Agawam Village is owned by the state and that the town has little say in how it operates.
    And then when those who wished to support Westfield rose to take a microphone, I heard intimidation, insults and booing. Most of those boos came from those standing at the back.
    How do you suppose it feels to try to speak during a public meeting and be treated that way? How would you feel if your wife or mother or grandmother rose to speak during a town meeting and someone screamed “Shut up!” and someone else shouted “Sit down!”
    That’s what happened to me when I stepped up to a microphone. Yes, I write for the Wareham Observer. But I did not attend town meeting as a reporter or columnist. I came because I am a resident of Wareham and I believe my rights as a citizen are every bit as important as anyone else’s.
    How many Westfield proponents stayed away from town meeting because (knowing the reputation of Wareham’s town meetings and the fervor of Westfield’s opponents) they didn’t want to subject themselves to that kind of behavior? In a comment under his own story on Wareham Week’s web site, McDonald actually wrote there was no intimidation at town meeting. How does McDonald know what anyone else felt at the meeting? I know how I felt. Please don’t speak for me, Mr. McDonald. You are not qualified to do so.
    How many seniors, unsure of their steps after dark, unable because of the aches of age to sit through three hours of town meeting, chose not to attend? How many parents exhausted from work and long commutes came home to find children needing help with homework? How many people in the midst of busy lives may have had a scheduling conflict with town meeting that night?
    I think selectmen should be congratulated for their decision to bring the question of Westfield in the form of a non-binding referendum before voters on April’s ballot. I think every single issue that can be placed on a ballot should be. It’s time to acknowledge that orchestrated disruptions, backroom politics, marathon town meetings, and the reality of overscheduled lives often prevent voters from having an opportunity to express their opinions. I think it’s time to applaud and celebrate to the fullest extent possible the democratic privilege of voting in the privacy of a voting booth.
    Maybe McDonald’s real concern is that the results of the referendum will not only support Westfield but also suggest that ballot questions are the wave of the future. That would prevent special interest groups from being able to bully people and getting their way at town meeting.
    Which path sounds more democratic to you?

 Read More ...
Down the Road - Andrea Smith - 16 opinions posted

2009 - The Year in Cheers
2009 - The Year in Cheers Read More ...

2009 - The Year in Jeers
2009 - The Year in Jeers Read More ...

Sports

CHAMPIONS! - Vikings win Div. 3 South boys basketball title

The Vikings celebrate after winning the Div. 3 South Section boys basketball title.
CHAMPIONS! - Vikings win Div. 3 South boys basketball title

    BOSTON - The mother of all garden parties is now right around the corner.
    The Wareham High School Vikings have a date with destiny on Monday as the newly crowned Division 3 South Section champions will play for all the marbles - a shot at playing in the state championship game - on the parquet floor of TD Bank North Garden.
    “We’re playing on Monday at the garden,” said Wareham Head Coach Kevin Brogioli. “I like the sound of that.”
    As well he should. His Vikings earned this in every sense of the word following their 76-71 victory over top-seeded Cardinal Spelling at a rocking Clark Arena Saturday afternoon at UMass-Boston. Now Wareham will face Bedford, the North Sectional champions, at 4:15 p.m. on Monday on a floor that elevated the Boston Celtics to the 2007 NBA Championship.
    “It feels so good,” said junior guard Jules Tavares, who tallied his 1,000th career point right before halftime. “We were ready to play. We played like a team. Everyone did their role. And now we’re playing at the garden.”
   Wareham improved to 23-1 with the victory, but it was anything but easy. With senior center Ryan Pina battling foul trouble trying to contain Cardinal Spellmen's sophomore senation Joe Glynn (24 power-points in the paint), the Vikings had to fight off run after run throughout the game.
    "Every time we get ahead by 10 they would chip the lead away," Brogioli said.
    It appeared Wareham was about to ice the game in the final minutes as Brockton's Cardinal Spellmen began fouling to preserve time. But a flurry of missed free throws by Wareham gave C-S hope until the very end.
   "We'll be practicing free throws tomorrow," Brogioli said, the smile sticking to his face.
   Although there were contributions throughout the Wareham lineup, the final curtain call belonged to Tavares, who scored a game-high 27 points on a wide array of jumpers and spinning lay-ups, not to mention a thunderous dunk midway through the third quarter that left the Wareham faithful delirious in the bleachers.
    "Jules has had an up-and-down season for us," Briogioli said. "He saved his best for last."
    Did he ever. Every time the Cardinals would make a run, Tavares took matters into his own hands, driving furiously to the basket to kiss another two points off the glass.
    "I saw the openings, but this was a team-effort," Tavares said.
    Wareham led at halftime, 42-32, mixing up man-to-man pressure with a 1-2-2 zone. The Vikings also unleashed full-court traps at times to keep the ball away from Glynn as much as possible. But after Spellemen's Paul Pitts and Mike Patti began finding open-looks on the parimeter, Brogioli stuck more to man-to-man pressure.
    It works as well as could be expected. Spellman came into the game as the tournament's top seed for a reason - they went 22-1 heading into Saturday because of a tremendous inside-out game which leaves opponents to pick their poison - get beat by Glynn or watch Patti and Pitts repeatedly deliver 3-pointers from a different zip code. Briogioli decided on secret option number three - distrupt the Cardinal offense with quick traps that sped up the tempo of the game and led to many Wareham open-court baskets.
   But the Cardinals quickly regained their composure after a little half-time chat by coach Michael Perry on the virtues of keeping your cool when a section title is on the line. Cardinal Spellmen responded accordingly, cutting Wareham's lead to four after an 8-2 run to open the third quarter.
    "We knew they would come out at halftime and try to set the tone," Brogioli said.
    The Vikings, however, don't rattle that easily. Senior forward Pat Murphy parted the Cardinal sea with a tough drive. After Patti responded with a three-point play to cut the lead to 46-43, Tavares went baseline before Glynn knew what just blew past him.
    After Wareham's Darren Gray hit a pair of free throws, the Vikings turned up the heat once again, forcing an over-and-back violation. Wareham pushed it up quickly, and Jordan Rezendes' lay-up gave the Vikings a 52-43 cushion.
    A few seconds later, following another Cardinal Spellmen turnover, Tavares found nothing between him, the ball, and an unguarded Cardinals rim.
    Scheduled time for liftoff: T-minus three seconds and counting.
    "That really got the fans riled up," Brogioli said of Tavares' monster semi-cradle jam.
    "I got up a little," Tavares said in the understatement of the day.
    But Cardinal Spellmen wasn't interested in rolling over. Trailing 62-52 heading into the fourth quarter, the Cardinals took advantage of the quick whistles of the refs and began hitting a bevy of free throws. Then Spellmen senior back-up center Jesse Andrerson went to work, pounding away at the offensive glass for four quick points. Paired with Gynn, the Cardinals suddenly went for bulk to offset Wareham's speed and athleticism. 
    Not liking what he was seeing, Brogioli called a 20-second time out with 3:10 remaining in the game and his Vikings leading, 71-64.
    The teams traded baskets until the Cardinals pulled within five, 71-66. With just three seconds on the shot clock and 56 second left in the game, Wareham called time out. After Rezendes set up from three, the Cardinals foolishly fouled him, giving one of the best players in Wareham history three shots from the free throw line. Rezendes hit two of them to extend the lead to 73-66.
    Rezendes had a chance to add two more from the line about 20 seconds later, but missed them both. After Pitts drained a 3-pointer from the corner, the Cardinals cut the advantage to four, 73-69.
    Brogioli's head looked like it was about to explode in front of 1,000 people after Tavares missed two straight from the line. But Wareham's defense tightened up, and Cardinal Spellmen could get no closer. 
    Rezendes scored 15 points for Wareham. Murphy added 11, please some tremendous open-court defense.
    "This is what basketball is all about," Tavares said. "We're playing at the garden."

 Read More ...
Robert Slager - 4 opinions posted

 Read More ...

 Read More ...

 Read More ...

Features

Opening a whole new chapter at the Wareham Free Library

Wareham Free Library
Opening a whole new chapter at the Wareham Free Library

    Interim Library Director Marsha Griswold said she is "thrilled" by the response to a recent appeal for volunteers.
    Sixteen new volunteers stepped forward, bringing the library’s volunteer staff to 26. Volunteers will be working throughout the library and its grounds, helping with everything from shelving books to exterior landscaping.
    "I love (the influx of volunteers). I think it adds a dimension to the library. I think it’s wonderful. I hope this will take on a new enthusiasm and a life of its own," Griswold said.
    Griswold said the first volunteer group meeting, which was held two weeks ago, went very well. Volunteer meetings will be held monthly.
    Asked what she wants the library’s volunteers to experience, Griswold said, "I hope they feel Wareham belongs to them; that not only are they contributing to the town but that they are part of the town as well. When you roll up your sleeves you get to know people. You get a sense of what the town is and of being part of the town and really making a difference."
    Kate Furler is assisting Griswold with coordinating the program and training volunteers. Formerly an educator in an alternative school (one of three responsible for managing 95 teenagers), Furler she said she knows how to think on her feet and keep people moving. Furler has volunteered at the library for a year and is delighted to see the list of volunteers growing.
    "When you volunteer there’s a sense of giving back to the universe. There’s a feeling of doing something productive," Furler said. "This is not something people have to do; it’s something they are giving. It’s an act of generosity. There’s a satisfaction that comes from the work. This is a finite task and you can see the product immediately. There aren’t a whole lot of things you can do in the community where you can see the beginning and the end. You can complete a task in the two hours you are there."
    The library’s good news extends far beyond new volunteers. Two staff members have been added through state grants as well as through federally funded Citizens for Citizens programs, which assists those age 55 and over who wish to return to the work force within non-profit and government entities. The new staff additions will provide 40 hours of labor at no cost to the town.
    An intern from U-MASS Dartmouth will also join the library this week. This individual will work along with the Wareham Historical Society archiving photos and documents in the Stone Research Room. Griswold said she’s looking forward to some of the photos being released to local media so that readers can help identify them.
    The library will also be premiering its own newsletter this month. Available at the front desk, it will contain book reviews and recommendations written by library patrons and staff. Submissions for the newsletter from children and adults are encouraged.
    While excited to have so much good news to share, Griswold is hoping they’ll be even more in upcoming weeks. There is still plenty of room for volunteers at the library. Specialized skills are not required. Training will be provided. Volunteers can commit to as few as two hours per week. All that is asked is that volunteers plan to commit to the same time slot each week. CORI checks and an application are required.
    Those interested should call (508) 291-3130. 
 

 Read More ...
Andrea Smith - 1 opinion posted

 Read More ...

 Read More ...

 Read More ...

Tri-Town Observer

Little Neck Village in $tate of grace
Little Neck Village in $tate of grace

  Thirty-six seniors on the waiting list for affordable housing in Marion have just moved a lot closer to having an affordable rental unit to call their own.
    Gov. Devall Patrick announced on Jan. 8 that Marion’s Little Neck Village is among 26 projects which will benefit from $153.9 million in resources leveraged from various affordable housing programs, American Recovery and Reinvestment funds, and private investment support.
    Funds made available for Little Neck Village will make possible the demolition of 12 aged existing units of senior housing and the construction of 48 new units. Demolition of the current units will not take place until the first phase of construction is completed, allowing current residents to remain on-site.
    Both consultant Dick Heaton (H&H Associates/LLP Bolton) and Dana Angelo (senior project manager for developer EA Fish) attributed Little Neck’s successful progression through planning stages and assignment of funding to the overwhelming support given the proposal by Marion’s town government and residents, as well as congressman Barney Frank, state senator Marc Pacheco and Rep. Bill Strauss.
    "This is very representative of a community getting behind an idea and making it happen," Angelo said.
    According to Heaton, approval of Little Neck for funding was based upon a ranking system for which points were given. Among the many aspects considered were financial, environmental and community support issues and market demand.

 Read More ...
Andrea Smith

The Buzz

   
 Read More ...

 Read More ...