
 District Attorney Tim Cruz |
| Inspector General steps in; Town to get computer disks back from DA's office
The Inspector General’s office of the State of Massachusetts has taken possession of 84 computer disks that were confiscated by the Plymouth County District Attorney’s office last summer following the town’s audit of its own computer system.
The town will also receive copies of 69 of those disks. Copies of the remaining 15 disks, which contain information from computers within the Wareham Police Department, will be turned over to Interim Police Chief Rick Stanley.
During Tuesday night’s selectmen meeting, Chairman Bruce Sauvageau said Town Counsel received a letter from the District Attorney’s office confirming that the Inspector General’s office will take over investigating what is contained on those disks.
“They are returning all of the disks (to the town),” Sauvageau said.
The news comes as a major victory for the Board of Selectmen, which has battled with the District Attorney Timothy Cruz for nearly eight months over possession of the disks.
According to Sauvageau, the only disks that were reviewed by the District Attorney’s office were those relating to police computers.
“The DA has referred the matter to the IG and the (state) ethics department for further investigation,” Sauvageau said.
The chairman also confirmed previous statements he has made that the Board of Selectmen were cleared of any wrongdoing in initiating and conducting the computer audit.
“There was no finding against us,” Sauvageau said. “When we receive the disks we will need to sit down with Town Counsel and discuss what to do next.”
Sauvageau said the Inspector General’s office will be focusing on two departments in their on-going investigation into alleged corruption (past and present) in Wareham. Although he did not state which departments were involved, the Observer has previously reported that the Wareham Free Library and the town’s Municipal Maintenance Department are the focus of the investigation.
Despite repeated requests from the town, the District Attorney’s office had refused to return the disks and has never officially acknowledged why the computer disks were confiscated last summer from a private digital forensic company hired by the town. The District Attorney convened a Special Grand Jury last July for an unstated reason and called Sauvageau, then-interim town administrator John Sanquinet and Systems Manager Matt Underhill to testify about the purpose and scope of the audit after Board of Assessor Chairman Steve Curry wrote to the District Attorney’s office, complaining that confidential information could be compromised.
The Department of Revenue ruled in the town’s favor on that issue. In a letter to the town, the DOR noted that nearly all assessor records are public.
According to a source, Rep. Susan Williams Gifford wrote a letter of complaint surrounding the audit to the DA on behalf of her husband, Mark, who serves as director of Municipal Maintenance. During an illegally broadcast executive session meeting of the Board of Selectmen, John Cronan said the computers of Mark Gifford and Pollution Control Facility operator Dave Simmons should be audited because they are “two of the biggest rats in town.”
The DA’s office later ruled that the selectmen had violated open meeting law because they had not invited Gifford and Simmons to be present during that meeting. The Board of Selectmen denied violating opening meeting law, claiming they had no way to know in advance that Cronan would make such a remark. They also noted that no further discussion ensued regarding Gifford and Simmons.
The Inspector General’s office has been investigating alleged improprieties within the Municipal Maintenance Department for nearly a year. The investigation widened to include the Wareham Free Library after the Observer reported that as much as $1.5 million may have been embezzled from the library under the direction of former library director/selectman Mary Jane Pillsbury, who died in 2008. According to library sources, the embezzlement scheme began after Pillsbury orchestrated a money-laundering operation in which specific people donating to the library received cash kick-backs. The money was then replenished by selling new books at various book sales, as well as from money taken from the library copy machines. A third method has not been publicly reported.
The alleged enterprise occurred from the early 1990s through 2005.
Read More ... Robert Slager - 18 opinions posted |